Burke’s Speech on East India Bill : page-04
main text: If I were to take the whole aggregate of our possessions there, I should compare it, as the nearest parallel I can find, with the Empire of Germany. Our immediate possessions I should compare with the Austrian dominions, and they would not suffer in the comparison. The Nabob of Oude might stand for the King of Prussia; the Nabob of Arcot I would compare as superior in territory, and equal in revenue, to the Elector of Saxony. Cheyt Sing, the Rajah of Benares might well rank with the Prince of Hesse, at least; and the Rajah of Tanjore (though hardly equal in extent of dominion, superior in revenue) to the Elector of Bavaria. The Polygars and the northern Zemindars, and other great chiefs, might well class with the rest of the Princes, Dukes, Counts, Marquisses, and Bishops in the empire; all of whom I mention to honour, and surely without disparagement to any or all of those most respectable princes and grandees. All this vast mass, composed of so many orders and classes of men, is again infinitely diversified by manners, by religion, by hereditary employment, through all their possible combinations. This renders the handling of India a matter in an high degree critical and delicate. But, oh! it has been handled rudely indeed. Even some of the reformers seem to have forgot that they had anything to do but to regulate the tenants of a manor, or the shopkeepers of the next county town.It is an empire of this extent, of this complicated nature, of this dignity and importance, that I have compared to Germany, and the German government; not for an exact resemblance, but as a sort of a middle term, by which India might be approximated to our understandings, and if possible to our feelings; in order to awaken something of sympathy for the unfortunate natives, of which I am afraid we are not perfectly susceptible, whilst we look at this very remote object through a false and cloudy medium. My second condition, necessary to justify me in touching the charter, is, whether the Company’s abuse of their trust, with regard to this great object, be an abuse of great atrocity. I shall beg your permission to consider their conduct in two lights; first the political, and then the commercial. Their political conduct (for distinctness) I divide again into two heads; the external, in which I mean to comprehend their conduct in their federal capacity, as it relates to powers and states independent, or that not long since were such; the other internal, namely their conduct to the countries, either immediately subject to the Company, or to those who, under the apparent government of native sovereigns, are in a state much lower, and much more miserable, than common subjection.The attention, Sir, which I wish to preserve to method will not be considered as unnecessary or affected. Nothing else can help me to selection out of the infinite mass of materials which have passed under my eye or can keep my mind steady to the great leading points I have in view. With regard therefore to the abuse of the external federal trust, I engage myself to you to make good these three positions: – First, I say, that from Mount Imaus, (or whatever else you call that large range of mountains that walls the northern frontier of India) where it touches us in the latitude of twenty-nine, to Cape Comorin, in the latitude of eight, that there is not a single prince, state, or potentate, great or small, in India, with whom they have come into contact, whom they have not sold: I say sold, though sometimes they have not been able to deliver according to their bargain. – Secondly, I say, that there is not a single treaty they have ever made, which they have not broken. Thirdly, I say, that there is not a single prince or state, who ever put any trust in the Company, who is not utterly ruined; and that none are in any degree secure or flourishing, but in the exact proportion to their settled distrust and irreconcilable enmity to this nation. traslation in bangla: If I were to take the whole aggregate of our possessions there, = যদি আমি সেখানে আমাদের সমস্ত অধিকারভুক্ত অঞ্চলকে একত্রে বিবেচনা করি, I should compare it, = তবে আমি সেটিকে তুলনা করব as the nearest parallel I can find, = আমার পাওয়া সবচেয়ে নিকটবর্তী উদাহরণের সঙ্গে, with the Empire of Germany. = জার্মান সাম্রাজ্যের সঙ্গে।Our immediate possessions = আমাদের প্রত্যক্ষ অধিকারভুক্ত অঞ্চলগুলোকে I should compare = আমি তুলনা করব with the Austrian dominions, = অস্ট্রিয়ার শাসনাধীন অঞ্চলগুলোর সঙ্গে, and they would not suffer in the comparison. = এবং এই তুলনায় তারা কোনো অংশেই কম প্রমাণিত হবে না।The Nabob of Oude = আওধের নবাব might stand for = তুলনীয় হতে পারেন the King of Prussia; = প্রুশিয়ার রাজার সঙ্গে; the Nabob of Arcot = আরকটের নবাবকে I would compare = আমি তুলনা করব as superior in territory, = ভূখণ্ডের দিক থেকে অধিকতর বড়, and equal in revenue, = এবং আয়ের দিক থেকে সমতুল্য, to the Elector of Saxony. = স্যাক্সনির ইলেক্টরের সঙ্গে।Cheyt Sing, the Rajah of Benares = বেনারসের রাজা চৈত সিং might well rank = সহজেই সমমর্যাদা পেতে পারেন with the Prince of Hesse, = হেসের রাজপুত্রের সঙ্গে, at least; = অন্ততপক্ষে; and the Rajah of Tanjore = এবং তাঞ্জোরের রাজা (though hardly equal in extent of dominion, = (যদিও রাজ্যের বিস্তৃতির দিক থেকে সমান নন, superior in revenue) = কিন্তু রাজস্বের দিক থেকে শ্রেষ্ঠ) to the Elector of Bavaria. = বাভারিয়ার ইলেক্টরের সঙ্গে তুলনীয়। The Polygars and the northern Zemindars, = পলিগার ও উত্তরাঞ্চলের জমিদাররা, and other great chiefs, = এবং অন্যান্য প্রভাবশালী প্রধানরা, might well class = যথার্থই একই শ্রেণিভুক্ত হতে পারেন with the rest of the Princes, Dukes, Counts, Marquisses, = অন্যান্য রাজপুত্র, ডিউক, কাউন্ট, মার্কুইস, and Bishops in the empire; = এবং সাম্রাজ্যের বিশপদের সঙ্গে; all of whom I mention to honour, = যাদের সকলের নাম আমি সম্মানের